buy custom King Abdualziz and King Faisal essay

buy custom King Abdualziz and King Faisal essay King Abdualziz and his son King Faisal established the strong western diplomatic ties that still exist today. During their reigns the Arabic world went through turbulent periods with the western countries, but the Saudi kingdom remained a steadfast friend to the west, a trend that has been maintained decades later. King Abdualziz had a knack for frank simple discussions as opposed to diplomatic niceties. This earned him a lot of respect not only in the kingdom but also throughout the western world. His son may not have shared his fathers simplicity, but he was an innovative leader interested in seeing the Saudi kingdom modernized. This implied he had to maintain strong ties his father fostered with the western countries in order to take advantage of the technological advances. Both leaders maintained strong believe in their Bedouin culture and the Islamic religion .However, this did not limit their vision and understanding that western forms of education were the key ingredients in d riving the state towards modernization. Thus they established higher education institutions modeled to the western education systems and sponsored to students to undertake further education abroad. King Abdualziz had no formal education but he oversaw the sophisticated transformation of Saudi state from war torn territory. He laid the foundation steps that enabled the kingdom rise in terms of economic prosperity and infrastructure modernization. King Abdualziz helped rebuild the Saudi state by retaking the territory through a series of successful campaigns that saw him emerge as a courageous and daring fighter. This was before declaring Saudi Arabia a kingdom in 1932, and taking the reigns as the leader. The state was fragmented into many factions, headed by different tribal leaders. One of his greatest achievements was, therefore, to unify the warring factions and turn the territory into a unified kingdom. He was also responsible for establishing the administration infrastructure that helped the Saudi Arabian kingdom rise to its current successful state. Among his many qualities that made this possible was his courage, charisma and daring bravado that saw him start a successfu l campaign to retake the state with a force of less than one hundred men.King Abdualziz also embarked on rebuilding the kingdoms army from a handful of untrained men into a formidable force that saw it retake the former states territory and reclaim more surrounding areas. This implied that he had to turn to the British for weapons and cash beginning the states relationship with the western powers. His ambitions were to turn the Arabia peninsula into one territory under his rule (Wynbrandt, 2010). These plans failed since he had to rely on Britishs help to arm his forces and for financial resources, and his ambitions did not align with their interest. He was, however, able to cultivate mutually beneficial relationship with the British that saw him ge the resources to train and arm his forces. The 1865 war with Ottomans Empire left the Saudi state in fragmented factions with no administration infrastructure or territorial borders. King Abdualziz had to rebuild the Saudi kingdom from the ground by uniting the existing fragmented factions and reestablishing the territorial borders (Wynbrandt, 2010). Therefore, among the biggest political problems that King Abdualziz had to contend with was lack of territorial borders for his kingdom. He had to fight a series of wars in order to reclaim the Saudi territory. In addition to this, since there was no legitimate government that was left after the war to governing the area, he had to establish the administration infrastructure for the kingdom from scratch. In other words, there were no established administration structures, governing the territory. Thus, the kingdom had to be established from the ground. This meant that the kingdom had no resources, since there was no government and oil was not yet discovered. This meant that there was no money to buy weapons for his forces, and he had to rely on help from other empires such as the British. Before the establishment of the Saudi Arabia kingdom, the territory was under different tribal factions. This, therefore, meant that the kingdom lacked a common unifying administration. The major social problem that King Abdualziz faced was lack of established social infrastructure and institutions for his citizens. In order to establish this, King Abdualziz faced a lot of resistance from the different warring tribal leaders as well as their people, who wanted the status quo maintained. Their state had no basic infrastructure such as transportation networks, communication or institutions. From 1932 up to the end of his rule in 1953, King Abdualziz helped to establish all these basic development pre-requisites. He declared the Quran as the new constitution for the kingdom (Chalcraft, 2010). He established transportation networks, communication, administration institutions, agriculture and modern technology among many developing projects. The diplomatic ties with the western countries saw British and American companies licensed to explore oil in the kingdom, since they had the technology. It was during his tenure that Israel was annexed from the Palestinian territory. Saudi kingdom, unlike the most Arabic states, at the time did not sever its ties with the western nations. He was, therefore, considered by the west as a voice of peace in the region. By declaring the Quran as the constitution for the kingdom, King Abdualziz established Saudi Arabia as an Islamic state. His rule was, therefore, governed by the Islamic principle, as stipulated in the Quran. However, Saudi Arabia, unlike her Arabic neighbors, such as Iran, Iraq and Turkey was less radical in application of the Islamic rule (Chalcraft, 2010). The kings Islamic rule was moderate, and was considered a just, honest leader of high integrity who kept his word (Kechichian, 2001). Although the king was also considered to be responsive to his citizens problems, most of the oil revenues ended up in his family coffers. This ended up making his family one of the wealthiest in the world. King Faisals rule saw the establishment of economic development plans that were seen as most responsible for the rapid economic growth that saw the kingdom rise to prominence. King Faisal, like his father, was strong and adherent of the Bedouin culture. He served as a minister in his fathers government and under the reign of his elder brother. This implies that by the time he took leadership, he was experienced in matters of the kingdom. Like his father, he maintained the western diplomatic ties, although he was a strong supporter of the Islamic ties. In addition, he also embraced modernization despite his strong ties with traditions; a factor that helped the kingdom become industrialized and developed rapidly. He oversaw the establishment of the first girls school in the kingdom, and an Islamic organization that was tasked with strengthening ties with other Islamic countries. He was also a strong believer in education and his government continued to put education on the forefront of their development agenda. During his leadership, the Arabic region was rocked by a number of wars with Israel and King Faisalstrongly advocated for peaceful resolutions to the arising issues in the region (Kechichian, 2001). He, however, is considered responsible for the 1971 world energy crisis for withdrawing Saudi Arabia oil from the world market; causing the world prices to drastically increase. He was strongly committed to the interest of Saudi Arabia, and those of the Arabic region. Unlike his father, however, King Faisal had resources to develop the kingdom since oil was already discovered, and the state had a lot of resources from the oil revenues. CONCLUSION King Abdualziz leadership and that of his son King Faisal had several similarities that include both leaders, embracing technology development. During his tenure, King Abdualziz laid the foundation for modernization of Saudi kingdom from a failed state, and his son oversaw his fathers development agenda prosper. During his reign, he established strong ties with the western countries that grew even stronger during his sons reign. These are some of the factors that have seen Saudi Arabia prosper into a modern moderate state. In addition they were both strong advocates of Arabic unity and sponsored organizations to further these interests. In the process they gained the respect and years of the regions leaders and people ensuring that Saudis weigh on Arabic affairs become crucial and influential. This implies that the two leaders were strong allies of the western countries. Buy custom King Abdualziz and King Faisal essay

Gastar Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples

Gastar Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples The Spanish verb gastar is a regular -ar verb that means to spend. The conjugation pattern for gastar is similar to that of other regular -ar verbs like bajar, tratar and llamar. This article includes gastar conjugations in the present, past, conditional, and future indicative mood, the present and past subjunctive mood, the imperative mood, and other verb forms. Using the Verb Gastar The most frequent use of the verb gastar is to spend money. For example, El chico gastà ³ mucho dinero en el regalo para su novia (The boy spent a lot of money on the gift for his girlfriend). Gastar can also be used to talk about time, but in that case, it means to waste time. For example, No debes gastar tiempo jugando videojuegos (You should not waste time playing video games). In order to talk about spending time, in Spanish we use the verb pasar tiempo, as in Me gusta pasar tiempo con mi familia (I like to spend time with my family). The verb gastar can also mean to use or to use up. For example, you can say Se gastà ³ la tinta de la impresora (The printers ink got used up), or Ese carro gasta mucha gasolina (That car uses a lot of gas). In addition, gastar can mean to wear out, as in Gastaste la suela de tus zapatos de tanto correr (You wore out the soles of your shoes from running so much). Gastar Present Indicative Yo gasto I spend Yo gasto muchos lpices en la escuela. Tà º gastas You spend Tà º gastas dinero en cosas innecesarias. Usted/à ©l/ella gasta You/he/she spends Ella gasta mucha electricidad en su casa. Nosotros gastamos We spend Nosotros gastamos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Vosotros gastis Youspend Vosotros gastis tiempo viendo fotos en el trabajo. Ustedes/ellos/ellas gastan You/they spend Ellos gastan mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Preterite Indicative There are two past tenses in Spanish. The preterite tense is used to describe actions completed in the past. Yo gastà © I spent Yo gastà © muchos lpices en la escuela. Tà º gastaste You spent Tà º gastaste dinero en cosas innecesarias. Usted/à ©l/ella gastà ³ You/he/she spent Ella gastà ³ mucha electricidad en su casa. Nosotros gastamos We spent Nosotros gastamos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Vosotros gastasteis Youspent Vosotros gastasteis tiempo viendo fotos en el trabajo. Ustedes/ellos/ellas gastaron You/they spent Ellos gastaron mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Imperfect Indicative The other past tense in Spanish is the imperfect, which is used to talk about ongoing or repeated actions in the past. The imperfect can be translated to English as was spending or used to spend. Yo gastaba I used to spend Yo gastaba muchos lpices en la escuela. Tà º gastabas You used to spend Tà º gastabas dinero en cosas innecesarias. Usted/à ©l/ella gastaba You/he/she used to spend Ella gastaba mucha electricidad en su casa. Nosotros gastbamos We used to spend Nosotros gastbamos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Vosotros gastabais Youused to spend Vosotros gastabais tiempoviendo fotosen el trabajo. Ustedes/ellos/ellas gastaban You/they used to spend Ellos gastaban mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Future Indicative Yo gastarà © I will spend Yo gastarà © muchos lpices en la escuela. Tà º gastars You will spend Tà º gastars dinero en cosas innecesarias. Usted/à ©l/ella gastar You/he/she will spend Ella gastar mucha electricidad en su casa. Nosotros gastaremos We will spend Nosotros gastaremos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Vosotros gastarà ©is Youwill spend Vosotros gastarà ©is tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo. Ustedes/ellos/ellas gastarn You/they will spend Ellos gastarn mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Periphrastic  Future Indicative   The periphrastic future is formed with three components: the present indicative conjugation of the verb ir (to go), the preposition a, and the infinitive gastar. Yo voy a gastar I am going to spend Yo voya gastar muchos lpices en la escuela. Tà º vasa gastar You aregoing to spend Tà º vasa gastar dinero en cosas innecesarias. Usted/à ©l/ella vaa gastar You/he/she isgoing to spend Ella vaa gastar mucha electricidad en su casa. Nosotros vamosa gastar We aregoing to spend Nosotros vamosa gastar mucha gasolina en el viaje. Vosotros vaisa gastar Youaregoing to spend Vosotros vaisa gastar tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo. Ustedes/ellos/ellas vana gastar You/they aregoing to spend Ellos vana gastar mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Present Progressive/Gerund Form To form the present progressive you need the gerund or present participle (the English -ing form). Present Progressive ofGastar est gastando Is spending Ella est gastando mucha electricidad en su casa. Gastar Past Participle To form perfect tenses like the present perfect, you need the past participle of the verb. Present Perfect of Gastar ha gastado Has spent Ella ha gastado mucha electricidad en su casa. Gastar Conditional Indicative To talk about possibilities, you can use the conditional tense. Yo gastarà ­a I would spend Yo gastarà ­a muchos lpices en la escuela si me gustara escribir. Tà º gastarà ­as You would spend Tà º gastarà ­as dinero en cosas innecesarias si fueras millonario. Usted/à ©l/ella gastarà ­a You/he/she would spend Ella gastarà ­a mucha electricidad en su casa, pero siempre apaga las luces. Nosotros gastarà ­amos We would spend Nosotros gastarà ­amos mucha gasolina en el viaje si fuà ©ramos en carro. Vosotros gastarà ­ais Youwould spend Vosotros gastarà ­ais tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo, pero el jefe no os lo permite. Ustedes/ellos/ellas gastarà ­an You/they would spend Ellos gastarà ­an mucha agua regando el jardà ­n, pero por suerte ha llovido bastante. Gastar Present Subjunctive The present subjunctive is used in sentences with two clauses, when the speaker is expressing a desire, doubt, denial, emotion, negation, possibility, or other subjective situations. Que yo gaste That I spend La maestra espera que yo gaste muchos lpices en la escuela. Que tà º gastes That you spend Tu madre no quiere que tà º gastes dinero en cosas innecesarias. Que usted/à ©l/ella gaste That you/he/she spend Carlos no cree que ella gaste mucha electricidad en su casa. Que nosotros gastemos That we spend Andrea no quiere que nosotros gastemos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Que vosotros gastà ©is That you spend El jefe no permite que vosotros gastà ©is tiempo en el trabajo. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas gasten That you/they spend El jardinero recomienda que ellos gasten mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Imperfect Subjunctive The imperfect subjunctive can be conjugated in two different ways: Option 1 Que yo gastara That I spent La maestra esperaba que yo gastara muchos lpices en la escuela. Que tà º gastaras That you spent Tu madre no querà ­a que tà º gastaras dinero en cosas innecesarias. Que usted/à ©l/ella gastara That you/he/she spent Carlosno creà ­a que ella gastara mucha electricidad en su casa. Que nosotros gastramos That we spent Andrea no querà ­a que nosotros gastramos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Que vosotros gastarais That you spent El jefe no permità ­a que vosotros gastarais tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas gastaran That you/they spent El jardinero recomendaba que ellos gastaran mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Option 2 Que yo gastase That I spent La maestra esperaba que yo gastase muchos lpices en la escuela. Que tà º gastases That you spent Tu madre no querà ­a que tà º gastases dinero en cosas innecesarias. Que usted/à ©l/ella gastase That you/he/she spent Carlos no creà ­a que ella gastase mucha electricidad en su casa. Que nosotros gastsemos That we spent Andrea no querà ­a que nosotros gastsemos mucha gasolina en el viaje. Que vosotros gastaseis That you spent El jefe no permità ­a que vosotros gastaseis tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas gastasen That you/they spent El jardinero recomendaba que ellos gastasen mucha agua regando el jardà ­n. Gastar Imperative The imperative mood is used to give commands.There are slightly different versions for positive and negative commands. Positive Commands Tà º gasta Spend!  ¡Gasta dinero en cosas innecesarias! Usted gaste Spend!  ¡Gaste mucha electricidad en su casa! Nosotros gastemos Let's spend!  ¡Gastemos mucha gasolina en el viaje! Vosotros gastad Spend!  ¡Gastad tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo! Ustedes gasten Spend!  ¡Gasten mucha agua regando el jardà ­n! Negative Commands Tà º no gastes Don't spend!  ¡No gastes dinero en cosas innecesarias! Usted no gaste Don't spend!  ¡No gaste mucha electricidad en su casa! Nosotros no gastemos Let's not spend!  ¡No gastemos mucha gasolina en el viaje! Vosotros no gastà ©is Don't spend!  ¡No gastà ©is tiempo viendo fotosen el trabajo! Ustedes no gasten Don't spend!  ¡No gasten mucha agua regando el jardà ­n!

Deprived Relationship between U.S. Working Mothers and Their Children Research Paper

Deprived Relationship between U.S. Working Mothers and Their Children - Research Paper Example This makes life a big challenge for them, because they have to manage everything just like stay-at-home moms, and because they cannot let down the expectations that their families have from them. And if they let down, they are considered as failed. They find themselves in constant guilt because they feel that they have not been taking care of their children because of putting their work ahead of them. They have to arrange for childcare, which takes away much of their salaries. They stay stressed. Their husbands do not spare them for not doing house work; and, their children suffer from not having them around them when they need them. This paper tends to discuss what difference lies between children of working mothers and those of stay-at-home moms. The thesis statement is that: the emotional relationship between working mothers in the U.S. and their children is not as good as the relationship between stay-at-home moms and their children. ... Why working mothers cannot leave their jobs is because they have built their careers over the years, and they cannot take the risk of losing the opportunities they have gained with their hard work. They have to return to their jobs because they know that in U.S., even after the establishment of some laws in their favor, like the FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act), employers do not like to give any relaxation to them when they want to spend some time off with their newly born children. So, they have to arrange for childcare and return to work. This makes them spend a good portion of the day away from their children, which diminishes their importance for the little ones, who learn to stay without them and depend on some other caregiver. Child neglect has taken its toll on the relationship between the mother and the child, which expresses itself when the children grow older into their teenage. They become emotionally distant, because they have been physically distant from their mothers. On the other hand, children of stay-at-home moms have their mothers around them 24/7, and they know that they are safe and protected. This brings them emotionally close to their mothers, and the impact is for lifetime. Although a stay-at-home mom cannot contribute in financial responsibilities of the father, yet she manages her home and looks after her children in the most appropriate way, which is something that makes her superior than working mothers in the eyes of her family, and especially her children. Stay-at-home moms bear more loving, caring, and confident children, than working moms. Confidence comes when children know that their mothers are with them, from the time they

Improving the value of the performance appraisal system Essay

Improving the value of the performance appraisal system - Essay Example This motivates creative and positive discussion in the workplace. Additionally, using an appraisal for each employee plays a major role in the managers attempt to improve performance appraisals (Deb, 2009). This means that the manager will assess the ability and performance of all employees as per their capacity as opposed to having a general format that all employees use. This move will create a focus-driven discussion that will allow the manager discuss issues based on an individual. Lastly, empowering the employees will lead to an improved performance appraisal (Deb, 2009). This refers to the managers helping the employees set meaningful goals and plan well on how to implement the same. The employees will also feel that the manager trusts them and most will commit to fulfilling the set goals. If the employees set the goals well, and achieve them in the end, it means the performance appraisal is successful (Deb,

Revenge and Vengeance in Shakespeares Hamlet - Revenge or Scruples? :: Shakespeare Hamlet Essays

Hamlet: Revenge or Scruples? â€Å"'Vengeance is mine,' sayith the Lord†. What does this mean? I believe what the Christians meant it to mean is that we, as humans, have no right to seek revenge, that only â€Å"the Lord† has the right to decide when to take revenge. We say this, but do we follow it? No, I think not. We all try to take revenge into our own hands, in one form or another. Revenge is one strong theme that holds throughout â€Å"Hamlet†. We see Prince Hamlet try to execute a kind of private vengeance, an eye for an eye, which is completely opposite of the Christian teachings. Hamlet is a man who believes in heaven and hell and who feels that a man who challenges divine ordinance will ultimately face judgment. We might look at the ghost of the late king Hamlet as the part of us that wants to take vengeance into our own minds. Like the little voice in our heads that tells us to do something, when in our hearts we know it is wrong. When Horatio, Barnardo, and Marcellus tell Hamlet of their sighting of the ghost, Hamlet agrees to join them that night and see if he can observe the ghost firsthand and possibly speak with it. That night when Horatio, Marcellus, and Hamlet sight the ghost, it beckons Hamlet to leave the other two and speak to it in privacy. Hamlet follows, despite the protests of the others, who fear it may be an evil spirit, disguising as King Hamlet in order to gain their trust. Horatio suggests that it may lead him astray and then "assume some other horrible form / Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason / And draw you into madness..." (I, iv, 80-82). Hamlet insists on listening to the message of the ghost. Although he does not state it, perhaps Hamlet subconsciously considers that Horatio is right, that the ghost is indeed a false messenger sent to trouble him. Hamlet does not kill Claudius immediately following his encounter with the ghost because he is unsure of the ghost's accusations of Claudius and does not want to murder him without proper motive. Hamlet would suffer in the eyes of the people if he were to murder Claudius, the reigning king, and claim his motive was the words of a ghost. Hamlet already disapproves of Claudius due to his marriage to Hamlet's mother, Gertrude, so soon after the death of her first husband, King Hamlet. Prince Hamlet feels that the widow did not sufficiently mourn and that the marriage is incestuous due to the relation between the late

Animals Have Souls!

Alexis Clendenin Gabriel 21 March, 2013 English IV Senior Project Animals have souls. Should Animal Experimentation for Medical Research be banned? Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an imperative role in leading to new discoveries and human advantages. However, many people tend to forget the great numbers of animal that have suffered serious damage during the process of experimentation. Many people misunderstand the nature the lives that animals actually live, and are unable to understand the actual laboratory procedures and techniques.Animal experimentation should be excluded because it is inhumane, unethical, and there are safer ways to test products. According to the latest US statistics, â€Å"Nearly one million animals were tortured, mutilated and killed in US laboratories in 2009. †(Business Wire) The most common animals used for experimentation are mice, rats, rabbits, primates, dogs, cats; no animal is safe from experimentation. (PETA) Animals shoul d be roaming free, not lying in a cold cage not knowing what’s about to transpire upon them. In the laboratory, animals are compelled to inhaling, ingesting getting injected with lethal substances. PETA) Humans have stronger rights than animals since we can reason rationally. We use animals to eat them, play with them, and wear their skins. Most vital, we use them as test subjects for medical purposes. The research has led us to discoveries which have saved millions of lives. The outcomes have led to immunizations against polio, mumps, hepatitis, diphtheria, and rubella; which have saved countless lives. (Gale, 2) Researching animals is crucial for scientists, medical societies, and health agencies all over the world to enhance the lives of humans. Government regulations around the world require that new drugs, vaccines and surgical implants first be tested in animals for potential toxic reactions. † (Gale, 1) The testing of animals is the only guaranteed way we can con tinue our production of safe medicines. Without animal testing scientists cannot be optimistic that all medicines on the market are safe and reliable. To be helpful to human beings, the drugs should be tested using human cells, tissues, and organs. Recent technological developments made it possible to replace experimenting on animals.The use of cell culture, analytical technology, micro-organism tests, and computer models are some examples of additional approaches for medical research. (O’Neill, 2) Scientists only want to obtain the best results and that is why they test on animals. Animals and humans can have the similar medical issues. (Gale, 1)†Opposition to all animal testing would require a life without drugs, vaccines, painkillers, anesthetics, and surgery. †(Gale 2) If we didn’t have any treatments to any illnesses, would the human species survive? The answer is unknown.Every day in the United States animals are beaten, neglected, or forced to strugg le for survival. Left in unsanitary conditions with no food or water, they have little hope as they live out their days without the compassion they deserve. Some are found and rescued, given the chance to experience how great life and humans can be; others aren't so lucky. To grow as a nation, we must fight for these abused animals' rights and severely punish heartless owners. It is up to us to speak for these creatures who lack a voice, for who will if we don't?One of the first steps in protecting animals and creating effective cruelty laws is knowing what animal cruelty actually is. There are two categories: passive cruelty and active cruelty. The first involves acts of omission, meaning the abuse happens as a result of neglect or lack of action. Passive cruelty might seem less serious, but that is not the case; it can lead to terrible pain and suffering, and ultimately death. Examples include starvation, dehydration, untreated parasite infestations, inadequate shelter in extreme weather conditions, and the failure to get medical care.Passive cruelty is sometimes due to the owner's ignorance, so many animal control officers will first try to educate neglectful owners on how to properly care for animals before giving them a citation or placing them under arrest. Active cruelty, on the other hand, is more well known and disturbing. Sometimes referred to as non-accidental injury, this type of abuse involves purposefully inflicting harm on an animal in order to feel more powerful or gain control.Active cruelty against animals should be taken very seriously, since it can be a sign that a person has serious psychological issues and may commit more acts of violence – possibly against humans. It is hard to tell just what drives people to harm innocent animals. â€Å"According to a 1997 study done by the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Northeastern University, animal abusers are five times more likely to commit violent crime s against people and four times more likely to commit property crimes than are individuals without a history of animal abuse,† says Pet-abuse. om. It is vital to report people who hurt animals. Most animal abusers find some sort of fulfillment or power in torturing a victim they know can't fight back, which is why crimes like rape and child molestation are committed. While not all animal abusers become serial killers or rapists, it is important to take every case seriously. For example, Carroll Edward Cole was a West Coast serial killer who may have murdered as many as 35 women in the 1970s and was executed in 1985. Based on Cole's testimony, his first violent act was strangling a puppy.The Columbine school shooting is another example of animal abuse as a precursor to human violence. Before killing 12 classmates and then turning the guns on themselves, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebod had bragged to friends about mutilating animals. If these acts had been reported to authorities a nd taken seriously, these two young men might have been put in a proper facility and helped, possibly avoiding the horrific massacre. Given these examples, it's hard to imagine why all states don't take animal cruelty seriously. Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakota have no felony provisions for cruelty to animals.According to the Humane Society, a good felony anticruelty law should protect all animals, apply to first-time offenders, carry large fines and lengthy prison time, have no exemptions, require convicted abusers to get counseling at their own expense, and prohibit abusers from owning or living among animals. Along with these laws we need officials who will strongly enforce them. Police, psychologists, and even the FBI recognize the link between animal cruelty and violence against people. To better protect communities, all states should institute strong penalties and work to increase public awareness of these crimes.It's not only up to the lega l system to ensure that communities across the country are aware and educated about animal cruelty. There are plenty of things everyday citizens can do. The simplest action is for people to take care of their own pets and learn the facts so they can educate others on proper animal care. Another easy way to help is by donating to or volunteering at a local animal shelter. Contrary to popular belief, volunteering doesn't require a lot of time; simply going in a few hours a week helps tremendously.Finally, by writing letters you can remind your local lawmakers that animal abuse is a real problem that needs to be addressed. Taking a few minutes to support this worthy cause not only helps animals, it allows you to feel proud about standing up for something so important to society. It is our job to be the voice for creatures who cannot speak up for themselves. As a nation we need to make it our priority to come together and ensure the safety of our beloved pets. As Margaret Mead once said , â€Å"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. †

Fast Facts on Italy - Rome and the Italian Peninsula